Difference between revisions of "ProtegeReasonerAPI"
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It provides methods for consistency checking, classification, etc. of an ontology as well as methods for getting the inferred information for a particular OWL entity. | It provides methods for consistency checking, classification, etc. of an ontology as well as methods for getting the inferred information for a particular OWL entity. | ||
− | This page is an updated version of the Reasoning API documentation and describes the reasoner API available since | + | This page is an updated version of the Reasoning API documentation and describes the reasoner API for Protege 3.4.1 and later (available since Protege 3.4 beta 120). The original version is available [http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/api/ReasonerAPIExamples.html here]. |
The previous reasoner API has been deprecated and should not be used anymore. | The previous reasoner API has been deprecated and should not be used anymore. | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
</div><br /> | </div><br /> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
Line 116: | Line 112: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | To get access to the internal Pellet reasoner and Pellet KB, you can use the methods from the <code>ProtegePelletOWLAPIReasoner</code> interface: | ||
+ | |||
+ | public Reasoner getPelletReasoner() | ||
+ | |||
+ | public KnowledgeBase getPelletKB() | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | To get access to the converted OWL-API model, you can call from the <code>ProtegePelletOWLAPIReasoner</code> interface: | ||
+ | |||
+ | public OWLOntology getOwlApiOntology() throws ProtegeReasonerException | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Note.''' Even if these functionalities are available in Protege 3.x, we do recommend to use Protege-4 that accesses the OWL-API directly and has much more advanced reasoning capabilities. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:37, November 30, 2009
Protege-OWL Reasoning API
This page describes the Protege-OWL Reasoner API that provides programmatic access to a direct or a DIG-compliant reasoner.
It provides methods for consistency checking, classification, etc. of an ontology as well as methods for getting the inferred information for a particular OWL entity.
This page is an updated version of the Reasoning API documentation and describes the reasoner API for Protege 3.4.1 and later (available since Protege 3.4 beta 120). The original version is available here.
The previous reasoner API has been deprecated and should not be used anymore.
Contents
The Reasoning API
The following sections provide a rough outline of how to use the Protégé-OWL reasoning API.
A new plugin type, the reasoner plugin, has been added that allows the integration of other reasoners into Protege. A reasoner implementing the reasoner plugin interface will be accessible through the Protege user interface the same way that the built-in reasoners are.
The examples on this page use an ontology that describes pizzas, which can be downloaded from here.
The inference package
The reasoning API is encapsulated in the edu.stanford.smi.protegex.owl.inference
package. The main classes that will be used are the ReasonerManager (used to obtain a reasoner) and ProtegeReasoner (an interface to the direct or DIG reasoner).
The Reasoner Manager
In general, the first step when using the reasoning API is to obtain an instance of ProtegeReasoner
for an OWL model. This instance of the reasoner can then be used to obtain inferred information about the model such as inferred superclasses, inferred equivalent classes, and inferred types for individuals. The ProtegeReasoner
manages communication with the direct or DIG reasoner, ensuring that it is always properly synchronized with the internal Protégé-OWL model.
In order to get an instance of ProtegeReasoner
for an OWL model, the ReasonerManager
, which is found in the edu.stanford.smi.protegex.owl.inference.protegeowl
package, must be used. The ReasonerManager
is a singleton class (a class with only one instance), whose instance can be obtained by using the static method getInstance()
.
To obtain an instance of a reasoner, the method createProtegeReasoner(OWLModel owlModel, Class reasonerJavaClass)
should be used. The second argument, reasonerJavaCode
, is the Java class of the reasoner for which you would like to obtain an instance.
The Protege full installation comes with three reasoner implementations:
-
DefaultProtegeDIGReasoner
: provides a connection to an external DIG compliant reasoner -
ProtegePelletJenaReasoner
: provides a direct connection to the Pellet reasoner accessed through the Jena API -
ProtegePelletOWLAPIReasoner
: provides a direct connection to the Pellet reasoner accessed through the OWL-API
Each of the above reasoner implement the ProtegeReasoner
interface. If you would like to use a direct connection to Pellet in your application, it is recommended that you use the ProtegePelletOWLAPIReasoner
.
In the following we will provide some code snippets that show how to obtain reasoner instances for the reasoners mentioned above.
Getting a DIG reasoner instance
The following code snippet shows how to get a DIG reasoner instance:
public DefaultProtegeDIGReasoner createDIGReasoner(OWLModel owlModel) { final String REASONER_URL = "http://localhost:8081"; // Get the reasoner manager instance ReasonerManager reasonerManager = ReasonerManager.getInstance(); DefaultProtegeDIGReasoner reasoner = (DefaultProtegeDIGReasoner) reasonerManager.createProtegeReasoner(owlModel, reasonerManager.getDefaultDIGReasonerClass()); // Set the reasoner URL and test the connection reasoner.setURL(REASONER_URL); if (!reasoner.isConnected()) { System.out.println("Reasoner not connected!"); } return reasoner; }
Getting a Pellet reasoner instance (accessed through Jena)
The ProtegePelletJenaReasoner
implementation converts a Protege-OWL model into a Jena model and then it uses the existing Pellet reasoner connection available in Jena for the inference.
The following code snippet shows how to get a Pellet reasoner instance that is accessed through Jena:
public ProtegeReasoner createPelletJenaReasoner(OWLModel owlModel) { // Get the reasoner manager instance ReasonerManager reasonerManager = ReasonerManager.getInstance(); //Get an instance of the Protege Pellet reasoner ProtegeReasoner reasoner = reasonerManager.createProtegeReasoner(owlModel, ProtegePelletJenaReasoner.class); return reasoner; }
Getting a Pellet reasoner instance (accessed through OWL-API)
The ProtegePelletOWLAPIReasoner
implementation converts a Protege-OWL model into an OWL-API model and then it uses the existing Pellet reasoner connection available in OWL-API for the inference.
The following code snippet shows how to get a Pellet reasoner instance that is accessed through OWL-API:
public ProtegeReasoner createPelletOWLAPIReasoner(OWLModel owlModel) { // Get the reasoner manager instance ReasonerManager reasonerManager = ReasonerManager.getInstance(); //Get an instance of the Protege Pellet reasoner ProtegeReasoner reasoner = reasonerManager.createProtegeReasoner(owlModel, ProtegePelletOWLAPIReasoner.class); return reasoner; }
To get access to the internal Pellet reasoner and Pellet KB, you can use the methods from the ProtegePelletOWLAPIReasoner
interface:
public Reasoner getPelletReasoner()
public KnowledgeBase getPelletKB()
To get access to the converted OWL-API model, you can call from the ProtegePelletOWLAPIReasoner
interface:
public OWLOntology getOwlApiOntology() throws ProtegeReasonerException
Note. Even if these functionalities are available in Protege 3.x, we do recommend to use Protege-4 that accesses the OWL-API directly and has much more advanced reasoning capabilities.
Querying the reasoner for inferred information
Once a reasoner instance has been obtained, the reasoner can be queried for information about the ontology. The ProtegeReasoner
interface contains several methods to obtain inferred information about classes and individuals. For example, there are methods to get the inferred superclasses and subclasses of a given class. The example below shows how to get the inferred subclasses for a specific class, in this case VegetarianPizza, which is a named class in the Pizza ontology. First, the asserted named subclasses of VegetarianPizza are retrieved via the OWLModel using vegetarianPizza.getNamedSubclasses()
. In the case of this example, the number of asserted subclasses should be zero. Next, the inferred subclasses of VegetarianPizza are retrieved by querying the reasoner, and are then are printed out.
// Get the VegetarianPizza OWLNamedClass from the OWLModel OWLNamedClass vegetarianPizza = owlModel.getOWLNamedClass("VegetarianPizza"); if(vegetarianPizza != null) { // Get the number of asserted subclasses of VegetarianPizza Collection assertedSubclasses = vegetarianPizza.getNamedSubclasses(); System.out.println("Number of asserted VegetarianPizzas: " + assertedSubclasses.size()); // Now get the inferred subclasses of VegetarianPizza Collection inferredSubclasses = reasoner.getSubclasses(vegetarianPizza); System.out.println("Number of inferred VegetarianPizzas: " + inferredSubclasses.size()); System.out.println("VegetarianPizzas:"); for(Iterator it = inferredSubclasses.iterator(); it.hasNext();) { OWLNamedClass curClass = (OWLNamedClass) it.next(); System.out.println("\t" + curClass.getName()); }
Updating Protégé-OWL with inferred information
Some of the methods on ProtegeReasoner
query the reasoner to obtain inferred information and then insert this information into the OWLModel
. This means that the model can be examined "offline" from the reasoner. An example of this is shown below. The classifyTaxonomy
method queries the reasoner for the consistency, inferred superclasses, and equivalent classes of every class in the ontology and then inserts this information into the Protégé-OWL model. The model can then be queried for the stored inferred information.
// We can classify the whole ontology, which will put the // inferred class hierarchy information directly into the Protégé-OWL model. System.out.println("Classifying taxonomy..."); reasoner.classifyTaxonomy(); System.out.println("...Classified taxonomy!"); // We can then use the methods on OWLNamedClass for getting inferred // information, without having to make separate queries to the // reasoner, as this information is now in the OWLModel. System.out.println("Inferred subclasses of VegetarianPizza:"); inferredSubclasses = vegetarianPizza.getInferredSubclasses(); for(Iterator it = inferredSubclasses.iterator(); it.hasNext();) { OWLNamedClass curClass = (OWLNamedClass) it.next(); System.out.println("\t" + curClass.getName()); } System.out.println("Descendand classes of VegetarianPizza:"); inferredSubclasses = reasoner.getDescendantClasses(vegetarianPizza); for(Iterator it = inferredSubclasses.iterator(); it.hasNext();) { OWLNamedClass curClass = (OWLNamedClass) it.next(); System.out.println("\t" + curClass.getName()); }
Examples of other methods that update the OWLModel are computeInconsistentClasses
, which queries the reasoner for the consistency of all classes in the ontology and the updates the OWLModel. Also, the computeInferredTypes
method queries the reasoner for the inferred types of all individuals in the ontology and then updates the OWLModel.
Example
You can download the Java file for the example used in this page from here.
In order to compile and run this example, you will need to include on your Java classpath the protege.jar, all the jars from protege-owl plugins folder and also all jars from the edu.stanford.smi.protegex.owl.inference.pellet plugin folder.