Protege4Migration - Revision history

Csnyulas: /* Side by Side Comparison */

2017-08-08T21:25:32Z

‎Side by Side Comparison

JenniferVendetti: This page has become somewhat outdated. Trying to update for benefit of user community.

2013-03-15T23:35:28Z

This page has become somewhat outdated. Trying to update for benefit of user community.

JenniferVendetti: Reverted edits by Joyservice (talk) to last revision by JenniferVendetti

2011-07-11T23:50:41Z

Reverted edits by Joyservice (talk) to last revision by JenniferVendetti

Joyservice at 15:22, July 9, 2011

2011-07-09T15:22:41Z

JenniferVendetti: (checkpoint save)

2009-06-16T20:21:56Z

(checkpoint save)

JenniferVendetti: (checkpoint save)

2009-06-16T20:20:13Z

(checkpoint save)

JenniferVendetti: (checkpoint save)

2009-06-16T20:19:22Z

(checkpoint save)

JenniferVendetti: (checkpoint save)

2009-06-16T20:15:43Z

(checkpoint save)

JenniferVendetti: (checkpoint save)

2009-06-16T20:15:01Z

(checkpoint save)

JenniferVendetti: (checkpoint save)

2009-06-16T20:11:24Z

(checkpoint save)

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3" style="border:1px dashed #BC8F8F;"
 ! align="left" width="50%" | Protege 3.x
-! align="left" width="50%" | Protege 4.0
+! align="left" width="50%" | Protege 4.0+
 |-
 | style="border-bottom:1px dashed #BC8F8F;" | [[Image:p3.3.png|frame|left|Protege 3 Screenshot]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <div class="orangeBox">
-<span class="orangeBoxTitle">Choosing between versions of Protege</span><br /><br />
+<span class="orangeBoxTitle">Choosing between versions of Desktop Protege</span><br /><br />
-This page contains a high level outline of the major differences in features between Protege 3.4 and Protege 4.0.
+This page contains a high level outline of the major differences in features between Protege 3.x and Protege 4.0+.
 </div><br />
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 == Overview ==
-There are a number of differences between Protege 3.4 and 4.0. This page is designed to highlight some of the major factors that may influence which of the two systems would be most appropriate for your project at present. It will also serve as a useful reference point for identifying major features that need priority migration from 3.4 to 4.0. This list is by no means exhaustive and is only intended as an overview.
+There are a number of differences between Protege 3.x and 4.0+. This page is designed to highlight some of the major factors that may influence which of the two systems would be most appropriate for your project at present. It will also serve as a useful reference point for identifying major features that need priority migration from 3.x to 4.0+. This list is by no means exhaustive and is only intended as an overview.
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 === Frames ===
-For working with '''frames-based ontologies''' there is only one choice - Protege 3.4 is built on a very mature and stable codebase. Frames support is not currently available in P4.x.
+For working with '''frames-based ontologies''' there is only one choice - Protege 3.5 is built on a very mature and stable codebase. Frames support is not currently available in Protege 4.0+.
 === OWL (and RDF) ===

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:50, July 11, 2011
Line 115:		Line 115:
	\| valign="top" \| None (database back-end has not been migrated yet)<br /><br />		\| valign="top" \| None (database back-end has not been migrated yet)<br /><br />
	\|}		\|}
−	*[http://www.thegrizasonline.com/ Business Solutions & Tools]
−	*[http://www.hostgatorcouponsreview.com HostGator Coupons]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, July 9, 2011
Line 115:		Line 115:
	\| valign="top" \| None (database back-end has not been migrated yet)<br /><br />		\| valign="top" \| None (database back-end has not been migrated yet)<br /><br />
	\|}		\|}
		+	*[http://www.thegrizasonline.com/ Business Solutions & Tools]
		+	*[http://www.hostgatorcouponsreview.com HostGator Coupons]

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 == Side by Side Comparison ==
 {| cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3" style="border:1px dashed #BC8F8F;"
 ! align="left" width="50%" | Protege 3.x

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Protege 4.x uses the open source, Java-based [http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/ OWL API] that is proving popular with many developers around the world. This makes writing or migrating to and from other systems more straightforward, and a larger developer community means more assistance and a more robust codebase. In addition, the OWL API supports much of the upcoming OWL 2.0 recommendation.
-However, for developers that require access to the RDF model at the level of a triple store, the [http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/api/index.html Protege-OWL API] from Stanford is an option.  This API was built on top of the older frames-based system, i.e., RDF and OWL constructs are layered over Protege' frame objects. This is much harder to develop with as all levels of abstraction are visible at the API level, but allows for more control over the relationship between the different models.
+However, for developers that require access to the RDF model at the level of a triple store, the [http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/api/index.html Protege-OWL API] from Stanford is an option.  This API was built on top of the older frames-based system, i.e., RDF and OWL constructs are layered over Protege's frame objects. This is much harder to develop with as all levels of abstraction are visible at the API level, but allows for more control over the relationship between the different models.
 ==== Users ====

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 For coders writing '''purely OWL applications''', we recommend 4.x. For applications where you cannot cleanly break away from '''RDF''' you should consider 3.4.
-Protege 4.x uses the open source, Java-based [http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/ OWL API] that is proving popular with many developers around the world. This makes writing or migrating code to and from other systems much more straightforward, and a larger developer community means more assistance and a more robust codebase. In addition, the OWL API supports much of the upcoming OWL 2.0 recommendation, and this is unlikely to be supported in the existing Protege-OWL API.
+Protege 4.x uses the open source, Java-based [http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/ OWL API] that is proving popular with many developers around the world. This makes writing or migrating to and from other systems more straightforward, and a larger developer community means more assistance and a more robust codebase. In addition, the OWL API supports much of the upcoming OWL 2.0 recommendation.
-However, for developers that require access to the RDF model at the level of a triple store, the [http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/api/index.html Protege-OWL API] from Stanford is built on top of the older frames system, with RDF and OWL constructs being modeled down into Protege frames. This is much harder to develop with as all levels of abstraction are visible at the API level, but allows for more control over the relationship between the different models.
+However, for developers that require access to the RDF model at the level of a triple store, the [http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/api/index.html Protege-OWL API] from Stanford is an option.  This API was built on top of the older frames-based system, i.e., RDF and OWL constructs are layered over Protege' frame objects. This is much harder to develop with as all levels of abstraction are visible at the API level, but allows for more control over the relationship between the different models.
 ==== Users ====

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ==== Developers ====
-For coders writing '''purely OWL applications''', we would recommend P4.x. For applications where you cannot cleanly break away from '''RDF''' you should consider P3.x.
+For coders writing '''purely OWL applications''', we recommend 4.x. For applications where you cannot cleanly break away from '''RDF''' you should consider 3.4.
-The P4.x framework is based on the open source java [http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/ OWL API] that is proving very popular with many developers around the world.
+The 4.x framework is based on the open source, Java-based [http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/ OWL API] that is proving popular with many developers around the world. This makes writing or migrating code to and from other systems much more straightforward, and a larger developer community means more assistance and a more robust codebase. In addition, the OWL API supports much of the upcoming OWL 2.0 recommendation, and this is unlikely to be supported in the existing Protege-OWL API.
-However, for developers that require access to the underling RDF model at the level of a triple store, the [http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/api/index.html Protege-OWL API]
+However, for developers that require access to the RDF model at the level of a triple store, the [http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/api/index.html Protege-OWL API] from Stanford is built on top of the older frames system, with RDF and OWL constructs being modeled down into Protege frames. This is much harder to develop with as all levels of abstraction are visible at the API level, but allows for more control over the relationship between the different models.
 ==== Users ====

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 === OWL (and RDF) ===
-For working with '''OWL''' there are several factors that may influence your decision whether to use P3.x or P4.x.
+For working with '''OWL''', there are several factors that may influence your decision on whether to use 3.4 or 4.x.
 ==== Developers ====